Rep. Smith: Protect Life Rule reasserts needed regulations for Title X funding
July 29, 2019 at 12:37 p.m.
By Rep. Chris Smith
(On May 18), the Trump Administration announced its intention to reassert and promulgate portions of President Ronald Reagan’s modest but necessary life-affirming Title X Rule – a policy designed to ensure that taxpayers don’t fund, facilitate or promote abortion in America’s $286 million-per-year family planning program.
This new/old policy comes at a time when huge majorities of Americans – over 60 percent according to major polls – strongly oppose the use of taxpayer funds for abortion.
The Trump/Reagan policy – now called the Protect Life Rule – comes at a time when the high utilization of ultrasound imaging of the child in the womb has provided spectacular clarity and empathy and love for the baby.
First baby pictures today – the kind you put on the door of your refrigerator – are of unborn babies. No one can seriously deny anymore that unborn children are alive, dynamic, precious, a miracle – and defenseless.
Title X was intended to be about family planning – prevention – not the hideous dismemberment, chemical poisoning or deliberate starvation and forced expulsion of a defenseless unborn baby. There is nothing benign or compassionate about killing a defenseless child.
Created by Congress in 1970, Title X of the Public Health Service Act authorized taxpayer funds to assist “voluntary family planning projects” but made absolutely clear in the statute that federal funds were prohibited from being spent on “programs where abortion is a method of family planning.”
As Title X was administered, that didn’t happen.
To faithfully implement both the spirit and letter of the law, President Ronald Reagan issued a rule in 1988 that included physical separation of abortion activities from federally-funded family planning projects.
In response, the American abortion industry sued to get hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer subsidies – and lost. On May 23, 1991, the U.S. Supreme Court in Rust v. Sullivan affirmed the constitutionality of the Reagan Title X Rule.
Tragically, President Bill Clinton by executive order reversed the Reagan policy. He not only authorized abortion clinics and family planning activities under the same roof – co-location – but went further, mandating that Title X recipients refer for abortion – an egregious violation of conscience rights protected under federal law. By requiring abortion referrals, family planning service providers who oppose abortion were and are today precluded from all participation in the federal program.
Today, hundreds of abortion clinics are co-located as Title X family planning facilities. For example, 266 of Planned Parenthood’s abortion clinics are subsidized by U.S. taxpayers in the Title X program to the tune of about $56 million each year. Planned Parenthood is an organization that is directly responsible for over seven million deaths of unborn children, a staggering loss of children’s lives.
According to the White House, the new Protect Life Rule:
• Will physically and financially separate family planning clinics from abortion and make other important reforms.
• Will safeguard the conscience rights of providers, by eliminating the egregious, illegal, mandate that requires all participants in the program to refer pregnant women to abortion.
• Will not prohibit counseling that may include conversation about abortion. This would be in keeping with guidance issued by the George H.W. Bush Administration that affirmed “Nothing in these regulations is to prevent a woman from receiving complete medical information about her condition from a physician.”
If past is prologue, I fully expect an organized, aggressive, willful distortion of the Protect Life Rule. Nevertheless, in the spirit of honest debate and civil discourse, I urge opponents and the news media to be fair, accurate and balanced in their presentation of this new rule.
Rep Chris Smith (R-04) is a member of St. Gregory the Great Parish, Hamilton Square.
[[In-content Ad]]Related Stories
Sunday, December 21, 2025
E-Editions
Events
By Rep. Chris Smith
(On May 18), the Trump Administration announced its intention to reassert and promulgate portions of President Ronald Reagan’s modest but necessary life-affirming Title X Rule – a policy designed to ensure that taxpayers don’t fund, facilitate or promote abortion in America’s $286 million-per-year family planning program.
This new/old policy comes at a time when huge majorities of Americans – over 60 percent according to major polls – strongly oppose the use of taxpayer funds for abortion.
The Trump/Reagan policy – now called the Protect Life Rule – comes at a time when the high utilization of ultrasound imaging of the child in the womb has provided spectacular clarity and empathy and love for the baby.
First baby pictures today – the kind you put on the door of your refrigerator – are of unborn babies. No one can seriously deny anymore that unborn children are alive, dynamic, precious, a miracle – and defenseless.
Title X was intended to be about family planning – prevention – not the hideous dismemberment, chemical poisoning or deliberate starvation and forced expulsion of a defenseless unborn baby. There is nothing benign or compassionate about killing a defenseless child.
Created by Congress in 1970, Title X of the Public Health Service Act authorized taxpayer funds to assist “voluntary family planning projects” but made absolutely clear in the statute that federal funds were prohibited from being spent on “programs where abortion is a method of family planning.”
As Title X was administered, that didn’t happen.
To faithfully implement both the spirit and letter of the law, President Ronald Reagan issued a rule in 1988 that included physical separation of abortion activities from federally-funded family planning projects.
In response, the American abortion industry sued to get hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer subsidies – and lost. On May 23, 1991, the U.S. Supreme Court in Rust v. Sullivan affirmed the constitutionality of the Reagan Title X Rule.
Tragically, President Bill Clinton by executive order reversed the Reagan policy. He not only authorized abortion clinics and family planning activities under the same roof – co-location – but went further, mandating that Title X recipients refer for abortion – an egregious violation of conscience rights protected under federal law. By requiring abortion referrals, family planning service providers who oppose abortion were and are today precluded from all participation in the federal program.
Today, hundreds of abortion clinics are co-located as Title X family planning facilities. For example, 266 of Planned Parenthood’s abortion clinics are subsidized by U.S. taxpayers in the Title X program to the tune of about $56 million each year. Planned Parenthood is an organization that is directly responsible for over seven million deaths of unborn children, a staggering loss of children’s lives.
According to the White House, the new Protect Life Rule:
• Will physically and financially separate family planning clinics from abortion and make other important reforms.
• Will safeguard the conscience rights of providers, by eliminating the egregious, illegal, mandate that requires all participants in the program to refer pregnant women to abortion.
• Will not prohibit counseling that may include conversation about abortion. This would be in keeping with guidance issued by the George H.W. Bush Administration that affirmed “Nothing in these regulations is to prevent a woman from receiving complete medical information about her condition from a physician.”
If past is prologue, I fully expect an organized, aggressive, willful distortion of the Protect Life Rule. Nevertheless, in the spirit of honest debate and civil discourse, I urge opponents and the news media to be fair, accurate and balanced in their presentation of this new rule.
Rep Chris Smith (R-04) is a member of St. Gregory the Great Parish, Hamilton Square.
[[In-content Ad]]


